• Zur Hauptnavigation springen
  • Skip to main content
  • Zur Fußzeile springen

Galerie Brock

für Neugierige und Nachdenkliche

  • Art Blog
  • Kunst fürs Büro
  • Was ist Kunst?
  • English
  • Über Galeriebrock
    • Corona Blog 2020-22
    • Experimente
    • Blick ins Atelier
    • Selbstbildnisse
    • Malereien und mehr
    • Ein Bild verschenken
    • Kontakt – Impressum
    • AGB
    • Datenschutz in Galerie Brock

Political Art

11. April 2022 by Arild Brock Kommentar verfassen

Sculpture of people with money
«The Circulation of Money» by Karl Henning Seemann, Aachen, 1976 (details). Here people seem to become ugly, rather than beautiful, when dealing with money. Is this political art? The artist probably wants to criticise a society in which money has become too important.

We should distinguish between politics and morality. Some old bronze canons at the Akershus castle in Oslo carry the inscription: The King’s final argument. Politics is about state power and power is about violence. You should remember that and be reluctant to use politics to achieve your goals, whether individual, collective or that of a party.

War and peace

The problem about war and peace is that they are interconnected – at least by time. Peace to-day does not (and should not) make you forget that there has been war. (And if you forget, others will not.)

So what policy is most useful for maintaining peace?  One classical answer is: If you want peace, prepare for war. Another classical: If you want peace, maintain justice. But is there anything you can do to directly strengthen peace? Certainly, almost everything that binds two countries together contribute to peace, trade being the obvious example.

Sculpture showing hammer crushing swastica
Boringly clear-cut propaganda induces boringly clear-cut counter-propaganda. It may be a bit difficult to see, but the hammer of this piece of political art crushes a swastika. No, the sculpture is not from the Soviet-Union of the 1960ies, it is situated in Norway and was set up at a central square of the capital in 2015. The artist responsible: Bjørn Melbye Gulliksen.

Dependence and independence

However, trade makes you dependent. If not for ever, then obviously in the short run. How important is independence to you? The wider your horizon – regarding time and options, the more you see that what you now have, you risk not having later. If you want to be totally independent, don’t have anything to do with anybody.

If you, however, choose to be dependent (to a certain extent), you may one day find yourself connected to someone you no longer like (and sometimes people have deeper reasons). What do you do then, and how do you feel? Do you say that, – well, it worked for a while and it was worth it -? Or do you regret that you ever had anything to do with the X that you no longer like?

In George Orwell’s famous novel “1984” the government did the latter and took the approach even further. In order to maintain a clear-cut world in which everything is black and white, they changed the past. If the country switched from one enemy to another, the history of the country was rewritten.  ‑We are now at war with (say) Eurasia – we have ALWAYS been at war with Eurasia!

Confusion

Clear-cut propaganda in either direction may be boring, but I hold confusion to be no better. The image below was seen at the Kassel art fair in 2017.

Confused demonstration
“Fortunately, absurdity is lost (but they have hoped for more)” by Stelios Faitakis, 2014

The demonstration depicted seems to me to be quite confused.  I think artists read our time well if they see confusion. However, if they simply fall victim to confusion themselves and deliver confused art, it does not help us out, rather the opposite!

Less confused, perhaps, on the part of the artist, I find the contribution of the famous Chinese artist Ai Weiwei below. Ai Weiwei wanted to call attention to the problems of Syrian refugees and lent his name to the cause. Politics, ok, but I hold this to be no more art than any other citizen posing in the same way. If there is confusion about this being “art”, I guess Ai Weiwei is not responsible for that.

Ai Weiwei posing as refugeee
Ai Weiwei posing as a drowned, Syrian refugee child in 2015

Artwork of the fortnight

Is this painting clear-cut propaganda? Yes, but I will suggest it also has some subtle points.

Painting showing Napoleon Crossing the Alps
Napoleon Crossing the Alps by Jacques-Louis David, 1801 (Source: Wikipedia)

The background is blurred. Napoleon appeared on his domestic and on the European scene at a time by which people’s values and orientation were also blurred. The ground on which the equipage stands is barren stone. Add a common enemy, and this is the perfect background for the rise of authoritarian leadership.

Can you imagine yourself on the horse? If not alone, like Napoleon, perhaps along with thousands, or even millions, of others, all pointing in the same direction?

In any case, the limitation of power is that it can basically only destroy. It cannot basically create.——

  • See also Nationalism
  • About this blog

Kategorie: General

Leser-Interaktionen

Schreibe einen Kommentar Antworten abbrechen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Footer

Meta

  • Anmelden
  • Feed der Einträge
  • Kommentare-Feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Kontakt – Impressum
  • AGB
  • Ihr Widerrufsrecht
  • Datenschutz in Galerie Brock

© 2023 · Galerie Brock · Powered by Imagely